Understanding Work Meaning in Generation Z and Its Implications for Character Education

Authors

  • Apri Winge Adindo Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
  • Sutoyo Sutoyo Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v7i2.2671

Keywords:

Meaning of Work, Generation Z, Character Education, Work Orientation, Calling Orientation

Abstract

The rapid transformation of the labor market in the digital era has significantly influenced how young generations interpret work. As digital natives, Generation Z demonstrates distinct work orientations shaped by technological advancement, flexibility, and personal fulfillment. Understanding the meaning of work among Generation Z is essential, particularly in relation to strengthening character education as a foundation for future human resources development. This study aims to analyse how Generation Z in Surakarta interprets the meaning of work and to examine its implications for character education. This research employed a qualitative approach using in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation as data collection techniques. Informants were selected through purposive sampling to ensure relevance to the research focus. Data were analysed through thematic interpretation to identify patterns related to work orientation and value construction. The findings reveal that Generation Z predominantly interprets work as a calling rather than merely a job or career path. Work is perceived as an expression of personal interest, passion, and self-actualization. Consequently, they tend to avoid rigid and long-term employment structures that restrict flexibility and creativity. The study further identifies three major implications for character education: enhancing students’ capacity for reflective career decision-making, strengthening their ability to differentiate between needs and desires, and fostering responsibility and commitment in task completion. These findings underline the importance of integrating work-meaning perspectives into character education to prepare Generation Z for adaptive and value-driven professional engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu Daqar, M. A. M., Arqawi, S., & Karsh, S. A. (2020). Fintech in the eyes of Millennials and Generation Z (the financial behavior and Fintech perception). Banks and Bank Systems, 15(3), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.03

Aghaei, I., Haghani, M., & Limunga, E. J. (2022). Task and Relationship Conflicts, Employee Agility, and Perceived Job Performance. Journal of Management and Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.29145/jmr/91/02

Albert, L. S., Allen, D. G., & Harms, P. D. (2025). Ethical approaches to leadership in organizational contexts: An attachment theory perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2025.101099

Andrea, B., Gabriella, H.-C., & Timea, J. (2016). Y and Z Generations at Workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 90-106.

Andriyani, F., & Leksono, A. A. (2024). Effective Management in the Implementation of Link and Match Curriculum for Quality Graduates. Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 1(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.59373/jelin.v1i2.45

Bickle, J. T., Hirudayaraj, M., & Doyle, A. (2019). Social Presence Theory: Relevance for HRD/VHRD Research and Practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(3), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422319851477

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.

Desmiati, Kusnadi, E., & Yunus, A. (2023). Principal’s managerial competence in developing religious culture in smp 19 n merangin district, Jambi province. Attaqwa: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 19(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.54069/attaqwa.v19i2.611

Dieguez, T., Faria, A., & Loureiro, P. (2024). The Digital Frontier. Routledge, 82–110. https://doi.org/Routledge.%2520https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0612-3.ch005

Dolot, A. (2018). The Characteristics of Generation Z. Journal of New Trends in Management, 2(74). https://doi.org/DOI://dx.doi.org/10.15219/em74.1351.

Dwidienawati, D., & Gandasari, D. (2018). Understanding Indonesia’s Generation Z. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 250–252.

Dwivedula, R. S. (2024). Why Is Generation Z Motivated at Work? A Qualitative Exploration. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22273

Erri Wahyu Puspitarini, D. W. P. A. P. N. (2016). Game Edukasi Berbasis Android Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Untuk Anak Usia Dini. J I M P - Jurnal Informatika Merdeka Pasuruan, 1(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.37438/jimp.v1i1.7

Ferreira, J., & Fernandes, C. (2017). Resources and capabilities’ effects on firm performance: What are they? Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1202–1217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0099

Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6923–6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1

Haidar, M. A., Hasanah, M., & Ma`arif, M. A. (2022). Educational Challenges to Human Resource Development in Islamic Education Institutions. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(4), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v3i4.309

Hariadi, N., Sumardjoko, B., & Maryadi. (2024). Charismatic Leadership in Improving The Quality of Resources in Islamic Boarding School. Kharisma: Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.59373/kharisma.v3i2.42

Javid, F., Gul, A., Naz, I., & Ali, M. (2024). Do Islamic work ethics matter? Impact of aversive leadership on employees’ emotional and psychological health through the lens of conservation of resource theory. Sustainable Futures, 8, 100309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100309

Kristanu, O. Y. (2013). Analisis Rekrutmen, Seleksi, Dan Penempatan Karyawan Di PT. Nyonya Meneer Di Semarang. Agora, 1(3), 1–5.

Liu, J., Zhu, Y., Serapio, M., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2019). The new generation of millennial entrepreneurs: A review and call for research. International Business Review, 28(5), 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.05.001

Mahayosnand, P. P., & Sabra, S. M. M. (2024). Generation Z. GILE Journal of Skills Development. 4(3), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.52398/gjsd.2024.v4.i3.pp87-92

Onyeaku, J. (2024). Preparing for Tomorrow’s Work Today. In IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0517-1.ch005

Pietruszyńska, W. (2023). Comparative analysis of the X/Y/Z generations on the labor market in the European Union countries. Catallaxy. https://doi.org/10.24136/cxy.2023.006

Pujiono, A. (2021). Media Sosial Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Bagi Generasi Z. Didache: Journal of Christian Education, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.46445/djce.v2i1.396

Santosa, M. H. (2017). Learning approaches of Indonesian EFL gen Z students in a flipped learning context. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 7(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v7i2.689

Șerban, A.-V. (2025). Generation z vs. Millennials: Cultural differences in attitudes towards work. Management Student Working Papers, 3, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.24818/mswp.2025.04

Sholahudin, U. (2017). Pendekatan Sosiologi Hukum Dalam Memahami Konflik Agraria. Dimensi, 10(2), 49–59.

Tafonao, T., Saputra, S., & Suryaningwidi, R. (2020). Learning Media and Technology: Generation Z and Alpha. Indonesian Journal of Instructional Media and Model, 2(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.32585/ijimm.v2i2.954

Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103–113.

Wahyuningrum, E., & Si, M. (2005). Rancangan Pengembangan Karakter Anak Usia Dini Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Pedesaan di Kopeng Kabupaten Semarang. 1–11.

Witt, Gregg, L., Dereck, E., & Baird. (2018). The Gen Z Frequency: How Brands Tune In and Build Credibility 1st Edition.

Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(1), 21–33.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-23

How to Cite

Adindo, A. W., & Sutoyo, S. (2026). Understanding Work Meaning in Generation Z and Its Implications for Character Education. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 7(2), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v7i2.2671

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.