Effectiveness of Cipp-Based Evaluation Management Context, Input, Process, Product in Arabic Language Communication Extracurriculars

Triadi Wicaksono; Syamsul Anam; Asep Maulana

doi:10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i4.716

Authors

Triadi Wicaksono Pascasarjana UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Syamsul Anam Pascasarjana UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Asep Maulana Pascasarjana UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i4.716

Keywords:

Evaluation Management, Context, Input, Process, Product, Language Communication, Extracurriculars

Abstract

This article aims to describe the effectiveness of CIPP-based evaluation management (Context, Input, Process, Product) in Arabic vocabulary and communication mastery at Madrasah Aliyah Unggulan Nuris Jember. The research subjects were students and teachers of the Nuris Jember Madrasah Aliyah. This study used a qualitative research design with data collection techniques: in-depth interviews, document review, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), and (4) observation. Data analysis in this study used a qualitative descriptive analysis technique which consisted of the stages of data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results of this study were obtained, namely; 1) "Context" evaluation management includes curriculum policies for extracurricular programs by integrating the pesantren curriculum with the K13 curriculum and supporting the madrasah environment and parental involvement. 2) the input component shows that the extracurricular program curriculum policy is consistent with graduation standards, there are Arabic language day activities, and all educators have a high professional level. 3) the evaluation dimension of the "process" of learning according to a predetermined schedule. Learning methods and media are selected by adjusting the material. Facilities and infrastructure are also used properly. 4) the results of the "product" evaluation focused on three aspects, namely cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects in the ability to master Arabic communication actively and the ability to master Arabic books without translation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelbaset, T. E. M., & Jabari, N. A. M. (2020). Arabic language teaching evaluation process for non-native speakers. International Journal of Education and Learning, 2(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i1.157

Agus, A., Juliadharma, M., & Djamaluddin, M. (2023). Application of the CIPP Model in Evaluation of The Inclusive Education Curriculum in Madrasah Aliyah. Nidhomul Haq : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v8i1.2705

Alexsandra, & Ganefri. (2019). Evaluation of Vocational School Pratic Program CIPP Model. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 3(3), 180. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v3i3.21860

Arifin, Z., Desrani, A., Ritonga, A. W., & Ibrahim, F. M. A. (2023). An Innovation in Planning Management for Learning Arabic at Islamic Boarding Schools. Nidhomul Haq : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v8i1.3237

Asse, A., Putri, F. F., Fatimah, T., Nursyam, N., & Faqihuddin, D. (2023). Diversity Problems in Students’ Educational Backgrounds and Learning Program Policies of Arabic Language Education. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 4(4), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v4i4.701

Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Fawzi, T., & Dodi, L. (2022). Aspek Perkembangan Manajemen Pembelajaran Active Learning, Paikem Pada Kelas Unggulan. Attadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 5(2), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v5i2.247

Febriani, S. R. (2020). Implementation of Arabic Learning During Covid-19 Emergency in Indonesia: Hots, Mots, or Lots? Alsinatuna: Journal of Arabic Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.28918/alsinatuna.v5i2.2494

Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2020). Reprint of: Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 283(November 2019), 112629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112629

Hasan, A. A. (2020). Arabic Language Learning Curriculum Islamic Boarding School System. Ta’lim al-’Arabiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab & Kebahasaaraban, 4(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpba.v4i2.9985

John W. Creswell. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and reseacrh Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. In Sage Publication (Vol. 1). London: (Thousand Oaks, London, and New Delhi: Sage Publication, 2017).

Juryatina, J., & Amrin, A. (2021). Students’ interest in Arabic language learning: The roles of teacher. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 1(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v1i1.3459

Khairi, A., Jalinus, N., Hatta, U. B., & Padang, U. N. (2023). Learning-Independent Campus ( MBKM ) Curriculum By Using The CIPP Evaluation Model. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 5(2), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v5i2.3168

Lee, S. young, Shin, J. S., & Lee, S. H. (2019). How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model in medical health education. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 16, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3352/JEEHP.2019.16.40

Naser, M. N. (2022). Evaluasi Program Model CIPP Pada Lembaga Konseling Mahasiswa UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu. Nusantara of Research : Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, 9(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.29407/nor.v9i2.16890

Nira, R. D., & Fauziyah, Y. (2021). Development of Arabic Curriculum in Improving Pedagogic Competence of Lecturer Ma’had Umar Bin Al-Khattab. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v4i2.1480

Nur, P., Hidayanti, Y., & Maturedy, F. (2023). Implementation of Formative Evaluation on Arabic Debate Learning to Improve Arabic Language Skills. Al-Fusha: Arabic Language Education Journal, 5(2), 43–49.

Oktarina, H., Jasiah, J., & Rizal, S. U. (2022). Evaluation of Teacher Readiness Using the Cipp Model in Limited Face-To-Face Learning. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 14(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v14i1.40471

Purwaningsih, H., & Dardjito, H. (2021). Implementation of Cipp Model for Online Learning Evaluation During Covid-19 Pandemic. Getsempena English Education Journal, 8(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v8i2.1394

Rachmawati, M., Fahmi, A. K., & Sirait, A. (2023). Reviewing Listening Arabic Skill using the Quizalize Application. Izdihar : Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 6(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v6i1.25261

Rahi, S. (2017). Research Design and Methods: A Systematic Review of Research Paradigms. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 06(02). https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000403

Rahmatan, M. (2023). The Role of Strengthening Vocabulary Memorization in Facilitating Arabic Language Learning Students Babul Mu’arrif Jambi Islamic Boarding Schoo. Lisanuna: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(1), 83–98.

Ritonga, M., Sobhan, S., Bambang, B., & Khadidja, S. (2022). Utilizing Technology to Improve the Quality of Learning in Indonesia: Challenges and Consequences for Arabic Teachers. Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban, 9(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v9i1.24516

Seelawi, H., Tuffaha, I., Gzawi, M., Farhan, W., Talafha, B., Badawi, R., … Al-Natsheh, H. T. (2021). ALUE: Arabic Language Understanding Evaluation. WANLP 2021 - 6th Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, 07(03), 173–184.

Setyorini, E. T., & Khuriyah, K. (2023). The Influence of Teacher Professionalism and Creativity on Student Motivation in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Attadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 6(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v6i1.374

Sherman, R. R. (2018). Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and Methods. In New York: Longman. (Vol. 14).

Sriwahyuningsih R Saleh. (2022). The design of Psychomotor Assessment Instrument for arabic language learning. AL-KALIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban, 11(1), 5–24.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002). CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist. Evaluation Journal, 17(June), 82–99.

Susanto, Apri Wardana Ritonga, Ayu Desrani, & Yohan Rubiyantoro. (2022). Arabic Learning Design Based on 21st Century Skills during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v7i2.2235

Taguchi, N. (2018). Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. System, 75, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.010

Umam, M. K., & Nada, R. K. (2021). The Complexity of Arabic Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic at MIN 1 Yogyakarta. Mantiqu Tayr: Journal of Arabic Language, 1(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.25217/mantiqutayr.v1i2.1663

Verenoze., N. G. C. M. A. de O. G. de M. (2022). A Combination of Context Input Process Product and Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model to Determine the Effectiveness of E-Training for Principals. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 325–337.

Wardiyah, J., Budianti, Y., Farabi, M. A., & Sirojuddin, A. (2023). Merdeka Belajar Activity Unit at Madrasah Aliyah: Program Evaluation Study Using CIPP Method. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v6i1.2633

Williams, C. (2015). Research Methods; Qualitative and Quantatitve Analysis. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 5(3), 81–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10906-0_5

Zurqoni, Retnawati, H., Rahmatullah, S., Djidu, H., & Apino, E. (2020). Has arabic language learning been successfully implemented? International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13444a