Allegorical Language in the Holy Quran A Semiotic Interpretation of Surat Al-Hujurat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v3i2.132Keywords:
Al-Quran, semiotics, , taxonomy, allegory, interpretationAbstract
Scholars, including both Muslim and non-Muslim philologists and anthropologists, tend to agree that the Muslim holy book, Al- Quran[1], is not an easy text to read, understand and interpret, much more so than any other holy text available, say The Torah or The Gospel. However, for an open-minded scholar, to interpret Al-Quran is to experience an either pleasant or unpleasant encounter with all that it holds. Hence the variety of textual analysis relative to the various levels of understanding of the original message embedded in the allegorical language shaping it. In this context, reading Al- Quran can be viewed as an exercise in semiotics. This paper presents a panoramic view of this holy Book, but it dwells, more particularly, on exploring the taxonomy of interpretation of the probable messages underlying chapter XLIX, Surat[2] “Al-Hujurat”[3]. Using a semiotic stance to touch upon some issues ingrained in the sign language of this specific text, this paper uncovers the composite fabric of the Muslim communal system which also sounds universal in application when it comes to the shaping of healthy communities as regards the issues of divinity, righteousness, faith, ethics, humanism, justice, and accountability.
Downloads
References
Adamo, David T. 2015. “Semiotic Interpretation of Selected Psalm Inscriptions”.
ResearchGate. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contribution
Al Ghazali, Abu Hamid M. 2007. The Ninety-Nine Beautiful Names of God. Trans.
David B. Burrell and Nazih Daher. Cambridge: The Islamic Society.
Berisha, Emma. 2017. “The Quranic Semio-Ethics of Nature.” Islam and Civilization
Renewal 8, 47- 65.
Bukhari, Mohammad [Imam]. Sahih al-Bukhari [The Correct Bukhari]. Retrieved from
Deely, John. 2004. “A Sign is What? A Dialogue between a Semiotist and would-be
Realist.” The American Journal of Semiotics 20, No. 1:40.
Eco, Umberto. 1976. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University
Press.
De Saussure, Ferdinand. 1977. Course in general Linguistics. New York: McGraw- Hill.
Noble Quran (The), English trans. by Arthur J. Arberry. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 1998.
Patte, Daniel.1998. “Critical Biblical Studies from a Semiotic Perspective.” Semeia,
D. Patte (ed.). Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 3-26.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1994. Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic. James Hoopes, ed.
Chapel Hill, North Carolina: North Carolina University Press.
Siddiqui, Abdul Hameed. 1975. The Life of Muhammad, 2nd ed. Lahor, Pakistan: Kazi
Publications.
Sonesson, Goran. 2008. “Semiotic Stance and its Consequences for the Taxonomy of
Interpretation.” Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Goeran_Sonesson
Tabari, Ibn Jarir. n.d. The Hadiths in Imam At-Tabari. Retrieved from
https://www.hadithsanswers.com/the-hadiths-in-imam-tabari
________. 1993. “Sunan Abi-Dawoud” In Ahadith [Mohammad’s Talks], English
trans. Book 5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ibrahim A. El-Hussari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://pasca.jurnalikhac.ac.id/index.php/tijie/index.