Qiroati Method Program Management in Developing the Quality of Quran Reading for Students

Authors

  • Ni’matur Royyanah Universitas Pesantren KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto
  • Aris Adi Leksono Universitas Pesantren KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31538/cjotl.v4i1.1108

Keywords:

Qiroati Method, Quality of Qur'an Recitation, Education, Tajweed and Tafsir

Abstract

This research uses a qualitative approach with case studies in several educational institutions and Qur'an learning centers that apply the Qiroati method. Data was collected through observation, interviews, and analysis of documents related to existing learning programs. Data analysis is carried out with content analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that the Qiroati method has a positive impact on the development of the quality of Qur'an reading. By integrating aspects of tajweed and tafsir, learners can understand the meaning and law of tajweed contained in each verse of the Qur'an. Learning programs that adopt the Qiroati method are also able to provide a more immersive and interactive learning experience, helping learners overcome difficulties in reading the Qur'an correctly. However, challenges also arise in implementing the Qiroati method, such as the need for teachers who are skilled in tajweed and tafsir, as well as the development of learning materials that follow the students' comprehension behavior. Therefore, it is recommended that there is a holistic approach in designing learning programs, as well as continuous training for teachers to maximize the potential of the Qiroati method in improving the quality of Qur'an reading.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Shanawani, H. M. (2019). Evaluation of Self-Learning Curriculum for Kindergarten Using Stufflebeam’s CIPP Model. SAGE Open, 9(1), 2158244018822380. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822380

Aprilianto, A., & Fatikh, A. (2024). Implikasi Teori Operant Conditioning terhadap Perundungan di Sekolah. Urwatul Wutsqo: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.54437/urwatulwutsqo.v13i1.1332

Asad, M. (1980). The message of the Qur’an. New Era Publications.

El-Hussari, I. A. (2022). Allegorical Language in the Holy Quran A Semiotic Interpretation of Surat Al-Hujurat. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v3i2.132

Falah, A. (2019). Analisis Sistem Pendidikan Islam Berbasis Pesantren Anak-Anak Tahfiẓ Al-Qur’ân Raudhatul Falâh Bermi Gembong Pati Jawa Tengah. Edukasia Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 14(1), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.21043/edukasia.v14i1.3632

Khosyi’ah, S., & Rusyana, A. Y. (2022). Inheritance settlement of descendants of children and siblings in Islamic law with local wisdom in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2126615. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2126615

Mahjoob, M., Nejati, J., Hosseini, A., & Bakhshani, N. M. (2014). The Effect of Holy Quran Voice on Mental Health. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(1), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9821-7

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE.

Muawanah, S., Said, A., Furqoni, R., Muzayanah, U., & Mustolehudin, M. (2022). Evaluating Mandatory Tahfȋẓ Quran Program Implementation at Madrasah. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v8i2.20330

Muhaimin, M. (2011). Pemikiran dan aktualisasi pengembangan pendidikan Islam. Rajawali Press.

Siregar, M. Y., Siahaan, A., & Rafida, T. (2021). The Head of Madrasah’s Strategy in Developing A Culture of Love Reading The Quran. Nidhomul Haq : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v6i2.1675

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan: (Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-11

How to Cite

Royyanah, N., & Leksono, A. A. (2024). Qiroati Method Program Management in Developing the Quality of Quran Reading for Students. Chalim Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.31538/cjotl.v4i1.1108